About this recording
647–10
- President Richard M. Nixon
- Spiro T. Agnew
- Neil H. McElroy
- Sidney P. Marland
- Elliot L. Richardson
- John D. Ehrlichman
- Lewis A. Engman
- UNKNOWN
January 13, 1972
Conversation No. 647-10
Date: January 13, 1972
Time: 11:41 am - unknown time before 12:38 pm
Location: Oval Office
The President met with Vice President Spiro T. Agnew, Neil H. McElroy, Sidney P. Marland,
Jr., Elliot L. Richardson, John D. Ehrlichman, Lewis A. Engman, and Roy D. Morey.
Introductions and greetings
Robert E. Merriam
-Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations [ACIR]
Merriam entered at an unknown time after 11:41 am.
Report from the President's Commission on School Finance [McElroy Commission]
-The Commission’s schedule
-Dissent
-Non-public school assistance
-Paul Freund (?)
-Father [Forename unknown] Whelan of Fordham University Law School
-Catholic schools
-Projections
-Tax credits
-Tuition grants
-Cost of some programs
-Rev. William E. McManus
-Need for action
Nelson A. Rockefeller
-Education plan
-Failure
-Prospects
School funding
-State functions
-Allocation for elementary and secondary schools
-Local financing
18
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
-Source of funds
-Income, sales, property taxes
-Local expenditures of funds
-Supreme Court
-Warren E. Burger
-Federal government role
An unknown person entered at an unknown time after 11:41 am.
Refreshments
The unknown person left at an unknown time before 12:36 pm.
-Federal government's role
-Amount of aid
-Five-year period
-Urban areas
-Efficacy of grant programs
-Deterioration
-Young people
California and Texas decisions
-Impact on school funding programs
-Property taxes
-Examples
-San Marion County
-Compared to Apple Vally
-Minnesota
-States
-Equity
State funding
-Federal government
-Local school boards
-California
-Watts
-San Marino
-Local government vis-à-vis states
-Delegation of authority
-New Brunswick, Canada
-Hawaii
19
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
-Handling of funding
-Oregon, Ohio
Taxes
-Ehrlichman’s talks with McElroy
-Engman's work
-Value Added Tax [VAT]
-The President's conversation with John B. Connally
-Tax reform
-Property and general taxes
-California
-Sales tax
-Property taxes
-Regressive nature
-Sales tax
-Possible substitutes
-VAT
Prototypes of programs
-Revolutionary approach
ACIR
-Purpose
-Revenue sharing
-Federal support for education
-Schedule
-Congress
-Revenue sharing, welfare reform
-VAT
State and local perspective
-Agnew’s experience
-County government
-Tax reform in Maryland during Agnew's tenure as Governor
-ACIR
-Changes in intergovernmental relations
-Effect of broad-based tax such as the VAT
-Revenue sharing
-Private schools
-Approach
-Special revenue sharing for education
20
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
-Public relations
-Feasibility of VAT
Property tax
-Assessment rate differences
-Boston
-California
-Newark
-Sales taxes
-Relation to other taxes
-Income taxes
-Graduated
-VAT
-General revenue sharing
-Equalization of education costs
Bill in Congress
-Changes
Total tax picture
McElroy Commission, ACIR
-Departments of Treasury, Domestic Council and Health, Education and Welfare
[HEW]
-Revenue sources
-Study of equalization efforts
-State, Federal roles
-Equal educational opportunity
Property taxes
-Different kinds
-Assessment factors
-VAT
Government decentralization
-Administration goal
-State responsibilities
-Board of education
-Use of taxes
-Broad-based tax
21
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
HEW formulation
Projections on funding
-Court decisions
-Tax funds
-Sources
ACIR
-Property taxes
-VAT
Property taxes
-“Circuit breaker”
-State limit on amount elderly pay
-Conference on Aging
-Wisconsin
-Possible federal effort
-Treasury Department, Domestic Council
ACIR
-Additional staff
-Texas
-Congress
-Edmund S. Muskie
-Schedule
-Study of VAT
Special revenue sharing for education
-Possible public impression
-Funding
-Property tax
-State role
-Neighborhood and district role
-Tax base
-Relationship to use of money
-Congressional hearings
-Roman C. Pucinski and House committee members
-Illinois
-Chicago
-Sales tax
22
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
Executive Committee of the ACIR
-Further study of VAT substitution for property tax
-Schedule
-The President’s instruction
-Priority attention to school funding
-McElroy Commission
Federal Reserve Board [FRB]
-John E. Sheehan
-Background
-Composition
[General conversation]
Focus
-Pilot programs
-Local government control
Agnew, et al., except Richardson, left at 12:36 pm.
Inclusion of portions of Richardson’s statement in State of the Union speech
-Forthcoming radio talks by the President
Richardson left at an unknown time before 12:38 pm.
Date: January 13, 1972
Time: 11:41 am - unknown time before 12:38 pm
Location: Oval Office
The President met with Vice President Spiro T. Agnew, Neil H. McElroy, Sidney P. Marland,
Jr., Elliot L. Richardson, John D. Ehrlichman, Lewis A. Engman, and Roy D. Morey.
Introductions and greetings
Robert E. Merriam
-Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations [ACIR]
Merriam entered at an unknown time after 11:41 am.
Report from the President's Commission on School Finance [McElroy Commission]
-The Commission’s schedule
-Dissent
-Non-public school assistance
-Paul Freund (?)
-Father [Forename unknown] Whelan of Fordham University Law School
-Catholic schools
-Projections
-Tax credits
-Tuition grants
-Cost of some programs
-Rev. William E. McManus
-Need for action
Nelson A. Rockefeller
-Education plan
-Failure
-Prospects
School funding
-State functions
-Allocation for elementary and secondary schools
-Local financing
18
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
-Source of funds
-Income, sales, property taxes
-Local expenditures of funds
-Supreme Court
-Warren E. Burger
-Federal government role
An unknown person entered at an unknown time after 11:41 am.
Refreshments
The unknown person left at an unknown time before 12:36 pm.
-Federal government's role
-Amount of aid
-Five-year period
-Urban areas
-Efficacy of grant programs
-Deterioration
-Young people
California and Texas decisions
-Impact on school funding programs
-Property taxes
-Examples
-San Marion County
-Compared to Apple Vally
-Minnesota
-States
-Equity
State funding
-Federal government
-Local school boards
-California
-Watts
-San Marino
-Local government vis-à-vis states
-Delegation of authority
-New Brunswick, Canada
-Hawaii
19
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
-Handling of funding
-Oregon, Ohio
Taxes
-Ehrlichman’s talks with McElroy
-Engman's work
-Value Added Tax [VAT]
-The President's conversation with John B. Connally
-Tax reform
-Property and general taxes
-California
-Sales tax
-Property taxes
-Regressive nature
-Sales tax
-Possible substitutes
-VAT
Prototypes of programs
-Revolutionary approach
ACIR
-Purpose
-Revenue sharing
-Federal support for education
-Schedule
-Congress
-Revenue sharing, welfare reform
-VAT
State and local perspective
-Agnew’s experience
-County government
-Tax reform in Maryland during Agnew's tenure as Governor
-ACIR
-Changes in intergovernmental relations
-Effect of broad-based tax such as the VAT
-Revenue sharing
-Private schools
-Approach
-Special revenue sharing for education
20
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
-Public relations
-Feasibility of VAT
Property tax
-Assessment rate differences
-Boston
-California
-Newark
-Sales taxes
-Relation to other taxes
-Income taxes
-Graduated
-VAT
-General revenue sharing
-Equalization of education costs
Bill in Congress
-Changes
Total tax picture
McElroy Commission, ACIR
-Departments of Treasury, Domestic Council and Health, Education and Welfare
[HEW]
-Revenue sources
-Study of equalization efforts
-State, Federal roles
-Equal educational opportunity
Property taxes
-Different kinds
-Assessment factors
-VAT
Government decentralization
-Administration goal
-State responsibilities
-Board of education
-Use of taxes
-Broad-based tax
21
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
HEW formulation
Projections on funding
-Court decisions
-Tax funds
-Sources
ACIR
-Property taxes
-VAT
Property taxes
-“Circuit breaker”
-State limit on amount elderly pay
-Conference on Aging
-Wisconsin
-Possible federal effort
-Treasury Department, Domestic Council
ACIR
-Additional staff
-Texas
-Congress
-Edmund S. Muskie
-Schedule
-Study of VAT
Special revenue sharing for education
-Possible public impression
-Funding
-Property tax
-State role
-Neighborhood and district role
-Tax base
-Relationship to use of money
-Congressional hearings
-Roman C. Pucinski and House committee members
-Illinois
-Chicago
-Sales tax
22
NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF
Tape Subject Log
(rev. 10/06)
Conv. No. 647-10 (cont.)
Executive Committee of the ACIR
-Further study of VAT substitution for property tax
-Schedule
-The President’s instruction
-Priority attention to school funding
-McElroy Commission
Federal Reserve Board [FRB]
-John E. Sheehan
-Background
-Composition
[General conversation]
Focus
-Pilot programs
-Local government control
Agnew, et al., except Richardson, left at 12:36 pm.
Inclusion of portions of Richardson’s statement in State of the Union speech
-Forthcoming radio talks by the President
Richardson left at an unknown time before 12:38 pm.
Secret White House Tapes |